Court defers ruling on Ganduje’s alleged bribery, misappropriation case
A Kano State High Court, on Tuesday, reserved ruling in the case of alleged bribery and misappropriation filed against the former governor of Kano State and APC National Chairman, Dr. Abdullahi Ganduje, and seven others.
The Kano State Government instituted an eight-count charge against Ganduje, his wife, Hafsat Umar Ganduje, and six others, bordering on bribery, misappropriation and diversion of public funds running into billions of Naira.
Others charged with Ganduje are Abubakar Bawuro, Umar Abdullahi Umar, Jibrilla Muhammad, Lamash Properties Limited, Safari Textiles Limited and Lasage General Enterprises Limited.
When the case came up for hearing of all pending applications, counsel to Ganduje and his wife, Offiong Offiong SAN, filed an application for extension of time and urged the court to grant the application.
“We also filed our preliminary objection challenging the jurisdiction of the court, dated November 18, 2024, along with a 28-paragraph affidavit and a written address in support.
‘We also filed a reply on point of law dated April 4, 2025,” Offiong said.
However, counsel to the state, Mr. Ayodeji Adedipe, SAN, filed a reply to the notice of preliminary objection dated October 22, 2024, addressing all the respondents.
“The application is attached with seven paragraph counter affidavit and a written address dated December 13, 2024 attached along with several documents as exhibits” Adedipe said.
He prayed that the court dismiss the respondents’ applications for lack of merit.
Counsel to the 3rd and 7th defendant, Mr. Adekunle Taiye-Falola, filed a motion on notice on preliminary objection dated October 18, 2024, supported by a 14 paragraph affidavit and a written address.
“In reply to the complainant’s counter affidavit, we filed our further and better affidavit dated December 12, 2024 and a reply on point of law. We urge the court to grant the application as prayed” Taiye-Falola said.
Counsel to the 5th defendant Mr. Sunusi Musa, SAN, also filed a motion on notice on preliminary objection dated October 18, 2024 which was supported by an affidavit, exhibit and a written address.
“We also filed our affidavit, reply on point of law, and urged the court to grant the application with substantial costs against the complainant,” he said.
Counsel to the 6th respondent, Mr. Ashafa Yusuf, also filed a notice of preliminary objection dated September 9, 2024, supported by a nine-paragraph affidavit and a written address.
“My Lord, we filed a further and better affidavit dated February 17, supported by an 11-paragraph affidavit. We also filed a reply on point of law and urged the court to grant the application,” he said.
Also, Faruk Asekone, counsel to the 8th defendant, filed a notice of preliminary objection dated October 18, 2024, supported by a five-paragraph affidavit and a written address.
“In reply to the complainant’s counter-affidavit, we filed our further and better affidavit and reply on point of law dated February 13, 2025, and urge the court to grant the application,” Asekome said.
The judge, Justice Amina Adamu-Aliyu, granted the application for an extension of time.
Adamu-Aliyu adjourned the matter to rule on the notices of preliminary objection to a date that would be communicated to the parties at a later date.
